Now, primarily, there are two other main types of techniques. One of them is circular, and the other I personally just call "Triangular." Circular techniques are, of course, curved techniques that tend to move in circular or semicircular motions. Triangular techniques, as I see them, are basically techniques where the arm or leg is in a fixed position and the entire bulk of the limb is used. Clear examples of this style of technique are the shin strike and Shotokan's forearm block (not going to pretend I know the official name of this block).
Now, there are many flaws to a purist who, let's say, only takes Shotokan and "masters" it. Linear fighting is not very effective against multiple enemies, nor is it very good against people who are efficient with joint-locking and subduing.
Or is it?
Look at most of the martial arts tournaments you can see on television. A lot of them had some sort linear training, be it in the basic punch or a basic front/side kick. And we can look at the punch exclusively. Look at those tournaments. How many people throw correct front/reverse punches? I've personally not seen it very often. I see mostly hooks, jabs, and uppercuts, the generic boxing punches. When throwing those three types of punches, you cannot unleash enough force and retract with the same amount of force. Not only is it very difficult, but there's simply no point.
The purpose of "softer" arts (like Aikido, for instance) is to use the opponent's own energy and force against him. If someone threw a punch at you, you'd simply counter his force with his own force by pulling him a little (he's moving forward, so you force him a bit more forward), then allowing yourself to twist the force very easily into your favor.
But you cannot twist negative force when you're trained to twist positive force. Positive force is force coming into you. A punch, a kick, a swipe, whatever. Negative force is force moving away from you, which is the retraction of a technique. The reason why you cannot twist it is because during the moment between positive and negative forces, there is a force of zero. You cannot use the opponent's force against him if there is no force to work with.
But there's the primary flaw with both strikers and grapplers. Strikers, somewhere in the backs of their minds, are usually intimidated by anyone who can use their own force against them. So, quite stupidly, they generall throw the normal boxing attacks, relying on muscular speed, which is the perfect set-up for someone to counter that force. But those people who are countering, they're generally only given the common techniques (and that makes perfect sense. How many attackers do you think are going to throw a forward/lunch/reverse punch correctly on you?) and thus know only how to counter joint positions and muscular force (where the limb is and how it's moving).
Hip rotation is the key to all linear attacks. When you unleash hip rotation, you've probably trained enough that, after you throw the hips into the technique, you automatically throw the hips out of the technique; thus, you're automatically doing the Positive Force = Negative Force concept. When you do it in the hips, you usually do it in the actual strike, too.
Now, legs and arms are two different areas. Legs are bulkier, longer, and generally have to work against more gravity than the arms do; thus, the conception that they're slower when attacking above the hips. Now, you're not supposed to kick above the waist, anyway (to be an effective kicker), but given the abnormal popularity of Taekwon Do, then the several artsy martial artists (like myself, actually), well, it's usually an inevitable occurrence.
Because of that, though, I'm not going to talk about kicking. If someone grabs your leg because you kicked too high, then here's a simple solution: don't kick high anymore.
The punches, however, if thrown right with correct PF = NF (to do it correctly) and the necessary hip rotation (to get the power for it), there simply is nothing to grab by people who like grabbing things. There's an arm, sure, and a fist, yes, but there's no force to work with. If a punch is thrown the way it should be, then the grappler usually gets his act together the very instant you start pulling back.
There, the grappler must quickly rethink his strategy because he's no longer working with force directed to him but rather force directed away from him, and when someone is expecting to counter something done to him and not away from him, there's a very slight block in the mind there about what to do.
During that time, the striker should be doing something he should have either practiced, been taught, or picked up himself--when you feel something that's not yours, whether you touched him or he touched you, you follow it up with another attack, usually done as a "flail" (half-assed attack that has no real power but makes a cute little distraction and might slap or hit the opponent).
You can't be an effective linear fighter and pull attacks one-by-one. They must come as chains. Hip rotation allows that to not only happen, but be effective, even if you're throwing three limbs out there (both punches and a kick, unless you know how to kick with both feet at the same time and still be grounded).
The thing to remember is what you're taught in classes (or what you should be taught) which is to always always always snap your techniques back. Even if you hit someone, don't leave that limb out there. Bring it back--it has no other use out there. So long as strikers fight with generic attacks because they're generic fighters, then strikers will always buckle under the grabbers.
Just gotta work that snapping back. It works. But there's that little bit of intimidation in the mind that usually blocks it. That, or the arrogance of setting up chains.
Anyway, I'm gonna get back to posting more martial arts stuff. My next little entry is going to focus on the linear concepts of fighting, including its flaws and edges over the other styles (like grappling, etc.). Linear fighting is, well, hrm. Many people say it's extremely flawed (like, if someone purely took Shotokan Karate-do, it's always assumed that that practitioner is going to fail horribly against other stylists), and, well, you'll just have to wait.
So, yeah. That explains why I've not been on much. Well, PARTIALLY.
The other part consists of the people here. They weren't lying when they said it was the People's University. You can't NOT meet someone here. Hell, I've only been here two full days, now, and I've met five I regularly talk to (well, one's my roommate). One is also a man I have much respect for (he went to my high school, graduated two years before me, and I met him at Hinds, too. We recently saw each other after my Chemistry class).
Speaking parenthetically of Chemistry, there is no placement exam! Now, the only prerequisite is a 22+ on the math section of the ACT. So, rawk.
To conclude how well college is going... Well...
Let's just say, "I met a girl." :D
This'll be a rather simple entry inspired by one of my friends who was curious about a weapon-style he'd be proficient at.
Basically, there's a hat for every head, and there's a weapon for every body. Certain people are simply not going to be as good with a certain weapon as someone else will. Now, one can be pretty damn good, but to really perform the best one can possibly be, one needs a weapon that can match one's motor skills and one's body.
So, here's a rather basic list.
Massive, stocky people that tend to have more fat than muscle are people that would be best associated with axes. Axes are generally bulky weapons because of the aerodynamics involved, and are meant mostly for downward slashing. However, with too much muscle, one can slash too forcefully and not be able to glide the axe into chain attacks. Stock needs stock, though, so the bulkier people with flab can make excellent use of the axe. One who isn't yet good enough and doesn't exert enough force always has more control than one who is too good and exerts too much force.
Bodybuilders with strong muscles will find the best use with great swords, primarily the broadsword. With greater, heavier swords, fluidity isn't exactly reccommended. One needs raw might and strength to put the [broadsword] to its best use.
People with short limbs will find themselves better at handling short-ranged, affixed weaponry or long-distance artillery. Stuff like bows, claws, fans, sais, and, surprisingly, battle-shields (shields with spikes and other deadly protrusions). Weapons like those are meant to stay close to the wielder without being too close. Short limbs allow that.
People who can maintain balance effectively while spinning around and bending in odd positions would like the rapier. While one doesn't need to spin around and bend all weird while using the rapier, the overall effect of having put your body through those motions makes the quick, aerodynamic efficacy of the rapier very easy to handle.
Lanky people who don't have great maneuverability will, surprisingly, be best with a chain or flail of some sort. The weapons themselves are extremely dangerous when one gets a real one and one doesn't know how to use it. The clumsiness and lack of fluid flexibility, however, is what gives power into the flailing weapons. Lanky, less-coordinated people often put power into things they don't realize but are incapable of putting necessary power into things they want to. Chains and flails take little power, but when people are often just showing off by flailing the weapon around, the weapon's potential is usually never put forth.
Lanky people who are flexibly fluid are best able to handle polearms and staffs (I'm not going to call them "staves"). Poles are long and SHOULD be gripped at points where people with average length of limbs are not terribly best at gripping at while still maintaining weapon efficacy.
That pretty much covers the varying body types. Weaponry has nothing to do with one's height, of course, though usually height influences other things. Also, for other weapons (like stars, knives, etc.), those are pretty much easily handled by anyone. There's no real "potential" with little things like those.
Anyway, this is my word against anyone else's. I'm willing to explain more if anyone asks questions, but unless that happens, this is just taking my word for it.
Since then I have been involved in Taekwon Do (I am not about to separate that Tae from the Kwon), Baguazhang, Wing Chun, and Savate.
I never reached an official black belt in any of them (well, in Bagua and WC, there are no belt systems, or at least there shouldn't be).
In Shotokan Karate, I reached 3rd Kyu, or 1st Brown. The belt system went like this--White Yellow Orange Green Purple Purple Brown Brown Brown Black. So, you can see what 1st Brown is equivalent to.
In Taekwon Do, I reached what they called "probationary black belt." The belt system went like this--White Gold Orange Green Blue Brown Brown Red Sr. Red (a red belt with a huge black stripe going through the center of it horizontally) Prob. Black (same as Sr. Red, only the red is black and the black stripe is white) Black.
In Savate, I reached nothing because I was never trained in a dojo (friend's father taught me), but I was told I was somewhere between Red and Black.
I haven't trained in about a year, though, but once I get into college (this Thursday), I plan on getting back involved with Aikido, Shotokan, and Taekwon Do (what the university offers) and perhaps play my skills with Fencing.
So, anyway, I used to frequent numerous martial arts message boards once I had been in Shotokan for a year, and I learned all sorts of information about various arts. I can safely say I know OF almost every art out there, but I only really KNOW so many arts (I was an MA dork, so I did a lot of research for about 2 years on everything I could find about everything). I've had the pleasure of speaking to numerous martial artists (some liars, some I deem "extremely knowledgeable about their art")
I'll probably wind up discussing a lot about martial arts, such as what to look out for, what kind of styles benefit what people, etc. Now, I'm no professional fitness instructor or whatever, and I don't play the whole "Oh, yeah. You'll be GREAT if you stay in only about five months."
Martial arts is a commitment. I stuck with it until gas and my education became an issue. The biggest problems with martial arts are these four styles:
Shotokan
Taekwon Do
Judo
"Kung Fu"
Those four styles have, unfortunately, been VERY butchered. They're mostly "sports," now, and if you don't watch out and you're taking any of those styles, you could be ripped off, horribly, especially with Taekwon Do and Judo.
The only one I can really tackle as a "style" in and of itself is that nonsensical "Kung Fu." If you see the words "Karate," "Kung Fu," or "Academy of" on a dojo/building, chances are, it's going to be a rip-off of your money.
There is no such thing as "Karate" or "Kung Fu." Those are words primarily used to represent the origins of common styles. If it's "Karate," it's Japanese fighting. If it's "Kung Fu" or "Gung Fu" or "Gong Fu," it's Chinese.
Loosely speaking, "Karate" means "empty-handed" and "Kung Fu" means "hard work." Do those sound like "styles" to you? No, because they are not styles. They are "genres," if you will.
Anyway, I could write page after page on all this based on what I know, what I think, and what I believe, but I think that's enough for now.
I'll continue if I see any sort of interest. And I'm also ready to answer any questions to the best of my ability.
---
Kitties are soft and fluffy. I like plucking feathers from them and slapping them onto my pillow so it's all nice and soft. They're okay--it's a well-known fact kitties grow 800 feathers/minute.
Seriously, though. I have two cats over here. One's 15 years old, hasn't been to the vet since he was three, and is as healthy as he can be. He still has a few years left on him. It'll be upsetting when he's gone. The other is, like, 5, and has an unusually small head. She's an idiot and the spawn of Satan and only likes me (and even then, she has issues with liking me). She's nice and soft, though! :D
---
Bananas.
I remember when I was younger and my former best friend from back in, like, kindergarten/1st grade lived right next door to me. One day, we pretended we were monkeys, and we ate about fifteen bananas each. That's a lot for a young child, I think. Then, we proceeded to feel sick when we both hung upside-down for a while. I hadn't eaten a banana since then until, like, a year ago. I was feeling a bit uneasy, and I learned I had a huge potassium deficiency. So, I munched away at bananas, though that didn't exactly help as I was also drinking cokes and eating Chik-Fil-A.
Anyway, I like messing with bananas moreso than eating them. I LIKE SHOVING THEM IN PLACES, LIKE DOWN MY PANTS, UNDER MY ARMS, INTO MY FACE, IN DRAWERS, IN CABINETS, AND IN OTHER PLACES.
Ever try walking with five bananas in each pant leg? It's not that hard. :D
---
Passion.
Aviation. Freeze-dried food, non-stick pans, among other things were invented because of aerospace technology. From your cars to household appliances, aerospace is one of the most diverse fields out there. But, yeah. I'm more interested in aviation and aeronautics. I know nothing about it, really, in terms of plane names, military machines, and various vocabulary used to describe the plane.
But man, it's a fascinating subject. All I watch on TV, if I watch TV, are aviation shows on the Military Channel. I'm pursuing a double-major in Math and Aerospace Engineering and I plan on being a civilian for the Air Force as an engineer.
martial arts